GMO Trees Approved in Brazil: Common Sense & Precaution Ignored
Decision made in violation of national law and international protocols
Montevideo, UY and New York, NY (9 April 2015)–The Brazilian Technical Commission on Biosafety (CTNBio) met today where they formally approved an industry request to release a genetically engineered (GE) eucalyptus tree, applied for by FuturaGene, a company owned by Brazilian pulp and paper company Suzano. This is the first approval for commercial release of GE trees in Brazil or Latin America.
In an email < http://stopgetrees.org/wednesday-email-from-ctnbio-member-paulo-paes-de-andrade/> from CTNBio member Paulo Pase de Andrade to the Campaign to STOP GE Trees dated 8 April, he stated that the decision to approve GE eucalyptus was already made, indicating that today’s meeting was merely a technicality where FuturaGene’s request would be rubber stamped.
“CTNBio’s approval of GE eucalyptus trees was no surprise. Over the years, CTNBio has made many decisions in favor of releasing GMO crops in Brazil, ignoring – as also happened in this case – protests from a wide range of groups of society,” stated Winnie Overbeek, International Coordinator of World Rainforest Movement. “The Commission systematically disregards the precautionary principle, including the urgent need for detailed studies of the various impacts of this dangerous technology, even though this violates the 2008 decision on GE trees < http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=11648> made by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, to which Brazil is a signatory.”
In his email, Paulo Pase de Andrade of CTNBio disregarded the decision of the UN CBD, which he incorrectly referred to as the Cartegeña Protocol, stating, “…the release of this GM tree is solely a Brazilian question and no other country or group of countries has the right to interfere in our decision.”
Geneticist Dr. Ricarda Steinbrecher, co-Director of EcoNexus and member of the Federation of German Scientists countered by explaining, “regulation of trees on a national level will not be sufficient. The large-scale dispersion of reproductive material means GE trees are likely to cross national borders,” adding, “A review of the scientific literature shows that currently no meaningful and sufficient risk assessment of GE trees is possible. Both scientific literature and in-field experience show that contamination by and dispersal of GE trees will take place.” [http://econexus.info/taxonomy/term/11]
In Brazil, there are also major concerns about the impact of GE eucalyptus trees on the thousands of families that produce honey in the regions where eucalyptus are planted. These producers risk losing their organic certification and/or their international markets if their honey is contaminated by GE eucalyptus pollen.
On Wednesday, the Brazilian ´Forum to Combat Agrotoxins’, coordinated by the Public Prosecution Service and with participation of relevant groups and civil society, government and academia, warned that CTNBio has repeatedly violated the National Brazilian Policy of Biosafety. For these reasons, organizations in Brazil are exploring legal avenues to stop the release of the GE eucalyptus trees.
In spite of the approval, the coalition of groups organizing to stop this GE eucalyptus, are highlighting the many worldwide actions < http://globaljusticeecology.org/report-backs-from-the-global-days-of-action-against-ge-trees/> that have taken place against GE eucalyptus. In Brazil, organizations and activists mobilized to denounce the release during a public hearing on FuturaGene’s request last September in Brasilia; more recently, on 5 March 5, about 1,000 women from several rural and urban social movements occupied the operations of FuturaGene in Brazil’s São Paulo state, while at the same time 300 peasants organized by La Via Campesina occupied and shut down the meeting of CTNBio in the country´s capital, where the decision on FuturaGene’s GE eucalyptus was supposed to be made. Outside Brazil, global weeks of action were organized at Brazilian Embassies and Consulates on five continents against the release of the GE eucalyptus of FuturaGene, and more than 100,000 people signed protest letters, all of which were sent to the CTNBio members.
“Our challenge now is to continue to strengthen the movement against GE trees, in solidarity with Brazilian organizations and social movements, and also worldwide,” stated Anne Petermann, Coordinator of the International Campaign to STOP GE Trees. “As a woman from the Brazilian MST who took part in the occupation of the FuturaGene operations on March 5th pointed out ‘.. this model of agribusiness is the model of death, not of life’, and’ (..) we are here to defend a model of life, defend food sovereignty, and defend agrarian land reform.’ As Brazilians say: ‘A Luta Continua! – The struggle continues!”.